Chip 1998 September

home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search

/ Chip 1998 September / CHIP Eylül 1998.iso / Slackwar / docs / mini / Ext2fs-Undeletion < prev next >

Wrap

Text File | 1997-08-07 | 39.5 KB | 888 lines

Linux Ext2fs Undeletion mini-HOWTO Aaron Crane, <aaronc@pobox.com> v1.2, 4 August 1997 Picture this. You've spent the last three days with no sleep, no food, not even a shower. Your hacking compulsion has at last paid off: you've finished that program that will bring you world-wide fame and recognition. All that you still need to do is tar it up and put it on Sunsite. Oh, and delete all those Emacs backup files. So you say rm * ~. And too late, you notice the extra space in that command. You've just deleted your magnum opus! But help is at hand. This doc¡ ument presents a discussion of how to retrieve deleted files from a Second Extended File System. Just maybe, you'll be able to release that program after all... 1. Introduction This mini-Howto attempts to provide hints on how to retrieve deleted files from an ext2 filesystem. It also contains a limited amount of discussion of how to avoid deleting files in the first place. I intend it to be useful certainly for people who have just had, shall we say, a little accident with rm; however, I also hope that people read it anyway. You never know: one day, some of the information in here could save your bacon. The text assumes a little background knowledge about UNIX filesystems in general; however, I hope that it will be accessible to most Linux users. If you are an outright beginner, I'm afraid that undeleting files under Linux does require a certain amount of technical knowledge and persistence, at least for the time being. You will be unable to recover deleted files from an ext2 filesystem without at least read access to the raw device on which the file was stored. In general, this means that you must be root. You also need debugfs from the e2fsprogs package. This should have been installed by your distribution. Why have I written this? It stems largely from my own experiences with a particularly foolish and disastrous rm -r command as root. I deleted about 97 JPEG files which I needed and could almost certainly not recover from other sources. Using some helpful tips (see section ``Credits and Bibliography'') and a great deal of persistence, I recovered 91 files undamaged. I managed to retrieve at least parts of five of the rest (enough to see what the picture was in each case). Only one was undisplayable, and even for this one, I am fairly sure that no more than 1024 bytes were lost (though unfortunately from the beginning of the file; given that I know nothing about the JFIF file format I had done as much as I could). I shall discuss further below what sort of recovery rate you can expect for deleted files. 1.1. Revision history The various publicly-released revisions of this document (and their publication dates) are as follows: ╖ v1.0 on 18 January 1997 ╖ v1.1 on 23 July 1997 (see section ``Changes in v1.1'') ╖ v1.2 on 4 August 1997 (see section ``Changes in v1.2'') 1.1.1. Changes in version 1.1 What changes have been made in this version? First of all, the thinko in the example of file recovery has been fixed. Thankyou to all those who wrote to point out my mistaek; I hope I've learned to be more careful when making up program interaction. Secondly, the discussion of UNIX filesystem layout has been rewritten to be, I hope, more understandable. I wasn't entirely happy with it in the first place, and some people's comments indicated that it wasn't clear. Thirdly, the vast uuencoded gzipped tarball of fsgrab in the middle of the file has been removed. The program is now available on my website <http://pobox.com/~aaronc/tech/fsgrab-1.0.tar.gz> and it should soon make its way onto Sunsite <http://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/utils/disk-management/> (and mirrors). Fourthly, the document has been translated into the Linux Documentation Project SGML Tools content markup language. This markup language can be easily converted to any of a number of other markup languages (including HTML and LaTeX) for convenient display and printing. One benefit of this is that beautiful typography in paper editions is a much more achievable goal; another is that the document has cross-references and hyperlinks when viewed on the Web. 1.1.2. Changes in v1.2 This revision is very much an incremental change. It's here mainly to include changes suggested by readers, one of which is particularly important. The first change was suggested by Egil Kvaleberg <egil@kvaleberg.no>, who pointed out the dump command in debugfs. Thanks again, Egil. The second change is to mention the use of chattr for avoiding deleting important files. Thanks to Herman Suijs <H.P.M.Suijs@kub.nl> for mentioning this one. The abstract has been revised. URLs have been added for organisations and software. Various other minor changes have been made (including fixing typos and so on). 1.2. Canonical locations of this document The latest public release of this document should always be available in plain text format on the Linux Documentation Project site <http://sunsite.unc.edu/LDP/> (and mirrors). The latest release is also kept on my website <http://pobox.com/~aaronc/> in several formats: ╖ SGML source <http://pobox.com/~aaronc/tech/e2-undel/howto.sgml>. This is the source as I have written it, using the SGML Tools package. ╖ HTML <http://pobox.com/~aaronc/tech/e2-undel/html/>. This is HTML, automatically generated from the SGML source. ╖ Plain text <http://pobox.com/~aaronc/tech/e2-undel/howto.txt>. This is plain text, which is also automatically generated from the SGML source. Note that this file is identical to the one on Sunsite, so if you want the plain text, you are recommended to get it from your favourite LDP mirror (as it will probably be much faster). 2. How not to delete files It is vital to remember that Linux is unlike MS-DOS when it comes to undeletion. For MS-DOS (and its bastard progeny Windows 95), it is generally fairly straightforward to undelete a file - the `operating system' (I use the term loosely) even comes with a utility which automates much of the process. For Linux, this is not the case. So. Rule number one (the prime directive, if you will) is: KEEP BACKUPS no matter what. I know, I'm a fine one to talk. I shall merely plead impoverishment (being a student must have some perks) and exhort all right-thinking Linux users to go out and buy a useful backup device, work out a decent backup schedule, and to stick to it. For more information on this, read Frisch (1995) (see section ``Bibliography and Credits''). In the absence of backups, what then? (Or even in the presence of backups: belt and braces is no bad policy where important data is concerned.) Try to set the permissions for important files to 440 (or less): denying yourself write access to them means that rm requires an explicit confirmation before deleting. (I find, however, that if I'm recursively deleting a directory with rm -r, I'll interrupt the program on the first or second confirmation request and reissue the command as rm -rf.) A good trick for selected files is to create a hard link to them in a hidden directory. I heard a story once about a sysadmin who repeatedly deleted /etc/passwd by accident (thereby half-destroying the system). One of the fixes for this was to do something like the following (as root): # mkdir /.backup # ln /etc/passwd /.backup It requires quite some effort to delete the file contents completely: if you say # rm /etc/passwd then # ln /.backup/passwd /etc will retrieve it. Of course, this does not help in the event that you overwrite the file, so keep backups anyway. On an ext2 filesystem, it is possible to use ext2 attributes to protect things. These attributes are manipulated with the chattr command. There is an `append-only' attribute: a file with this attribute may be appended to, but may not be deleted, and the existing contents of the file may not be overwritten. If a directory has this attribute, any files or directories within it may be modified as normal, but no files may be deleted. The `append-only' attribute is set with $ chattr +a FILE... There is also an `immutable' attribute, which can only be set or cleared by root. A file or directory with this attribute may not be modified, deleted, renamed, or (hard) linked. It may be set as follows: # chattr +i FILE... The ext2fs also provides the `undeletable' attribute (+u in chattr). The intention is that if a file with that attribute is deleted, instead of actually being reused, it is merely moved to a `safe location' for deletion at a later date. Unfortunately this feature has not yet been implemented in mainstream kernels. However, various kernel patches exist which provide the ability to do reversible deletion; see <http://www.linuxhq.com/> if you're interested in patching this facility into your kernel. The most recent patch I know of is by Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl>, Darren J Moffat <darren@xarius.demon.co.uk> and Kurt Huwig <kurt@huwig.de>. I would point out though that while this patch implements the feature, it is not an `undeletion solution' at the moment. Undeletable files are merely moved into another directory; there should be a daemon to periodically clean up that directory. Some people advocate making rm a shell alias or function for rm -i (which asks for confirmation on every file you delete). Indeed, recent versions of the Red Hat distribution <http://www.redhat.com/> do this by default for all users, including root. Personally, I cannot stand software which won't run unattended, so I don't do that. There is also the problem that sooner or later, you'll be running in single-user mode, or using a different shell, or even a different machine, where your rm function doesn't exist. If you expect to be asked for confirmation, it is easy to forget where you are and to specify too many files for deletion. Likewise, the various scripts and programs that replace rm are, IMHO, very dangerous. A slightly better solution is to start using a package which handles `recyclable' deletion by providing a command not named rm. For details on these, see Peek, et al (1993) (see section ``Bibliography and Credits''). 3. What recovery rate can I expect? That depends. Among the problems with recovering files on a high- quality, multi-tasking, multi-user operating system like Linux is that you never know when someone wants to write to the disk. So when the operating system is told to delete a file, it assumes that the blocks used by that file are fair game when it wants to allocate space for a new file. (This is a specific example of a general principle for Linux: the kernel and the associated tools assume that the users aren't idiots.) In general, the more usage your machine gets, the less likely you are to be able to recover files successfully. Also, disk fragmentation can affect the ease of recovering files. If the partition containing the deleted files is very fragmented, you are unlikely to be able to read a whole file. If your machine, like mine, is effectively a single-user workstation (mine doesn't even have a net connection yet; maybe next year), and you weren't doing anything disk-intensive at the fatal moment of deleting those files, I would expect a recovery rate in the same ball- park as detailed above. I retrieved nearly 94% of the files (and these were binary files, please note) undamaged. If you get 80% or better, you can feel pretty pleased with yourself, I should think. 4. So, how do I undelete a file? The procedure principally involves finding the data on the raw partition device and making it visible again to the operating system. There are basically two ways of doing this: one is to modify the existing filesystem such that the deleted inodes have their `deleted' flag removed, and hope that the data just magically falls back into place. The other method, which is safer but slower, is to work out where the data lies in the partition and write it out into a new file. There are some steps you need to take before beginning to attempt your data recovery; see sections ``Unmounting the filesystem'', ``Preparing to change inodes directly'' and ``Preparing to write data elsewhere'' for details. To find out how to actually retrieve your files, see sections ``Finding the deleted inodes'', ``Obtaining the details of the inodes'', ``Recovering data blocks'' and ``Modifying inodes directly''. 5. Unmounting the filesystem Regardless of which method you choose, the first step is to unmount the filesystem containing the deleted files. I strongly discourage any urges you may have to mess around on a mounted filesystem. This step should be performed as soon as possible after you realise that the files have been deleted. The simplest method is as follows: assuming the deleted files were in the /usr partition, say: # umount /usr You may, however, want to keep some things in /usr available. So remount it read-only: # mount -o ro,remount /usr If the deleted files were on the root partition, you'll need to add a -n option to prevent mount from trying to write to /etc/mtab: # mount -n -o ro,remount / Regardless of all this, it is possible that there will be another process using that filesystem (which will cause the unmount to fail with an error such as `Resource busy'). There is a program which will send a signal to any process using a given file or mount point: fuser. Try this for the /usr partition: # fuser -v -m /usr This lists the processes involved. Assuming none of them are vital, you can say # fuser -k -v -m /usr to send each process a SIGKILL (which is guaranteed to kill it), or for example, # fuser -k -TERM -v -m /usr to give each one a SIGTERM (which will normally make the process exit cleanly). 6. Preparing to change inodes directly My advice? Don't do it this way. I really don't think it's wise to play with a filesystem at a low enough level for this to work. There are also has problems in that you can only reliably recover the first 12 blocks of each file. So if you have any long files to recover, you'll have to use the other method anyway. (Although see section ``Will this get easier in future?'' for additional information.) If you feel you must do it this way, my advice is to copy the raw partition data to an image on a different partition, and then mount this using loopback: # cp /dev/hda5 /root/working # mount -t ext2 -o loop /root/working /mnt This does, however, require a recent version of mount. (Although you should get version 2.6 or newer anyway, as all earlier versions have a major security bug which allows peons to get root access. The major distributions, that is, Debian, RedHat and Slackware, have all been updated with version 2.6 of mount.) Using loopback means that when you completely destroy the filesystem (as you quite possibly will), all you have to do is copy the raw partition back and start again. 7. Preparing to write data elsewhere You need to make sure you have a rescue partition somewhere. Hopefully, your system has several partitions on it: perhaps a root, a /usr, and a /home. With all these to choose from, you should have no problem: just create a new directory on one of these. If you have only a root partition, and store everything on that (like me, until I can get around to repartitioning), things are slightly more awkward. Perhaps you have an MS-DOS or Windows partition you could use? Or you have the ramdisk driver in your kernel, maybe as a module? To use the ramdisk (assuming a kernel more recent than 1.3.48), say the following: # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ram0 bs=1k count=2048 # mke2fs -v -m 0 /dev/ram0 2048 # mount -t ext2 /dev/ram0 /mnt This creates a 2MB ramdisk volume, and mounts it on /mnt. A short word of warning: if you use kerneld to automatically load and unload kernel modules, then don't unmount the ramdisk until you've copied any files from it onto non-volatile storage. Once you unmount it, kerneld assumes it can unload the module (after the usual waiting period), and once this happens, the memory gets re-used by other parts of the kernel, losing all the painstaking hours you just spent recovering your data. If you have any of the new `superfloppy' removable devices, they're probably a good choice for a rescue partition location. Otherwise, you'll just have to stick with floppies. The other thing you're likely to need is a program which can read the necessary data from the middle of the partition device. At a pinch, dd will do the job, but to read from, say, 600 MB into an 800 MB partition, dd insists on reading but ignoring the first 600 MB. This takes a not inconsiderable amount of time. My way round this was to write a program which will seek to the middle of the partition. It's called fsgrab; you can find the source package on my website <http://pobox.com/~aaronc/tech/fsgrab-1.0.tar.gz> and it should soon make its way onto Sunsite <http://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/utils/disk-management/> (and mirrors). If you want to use this method, the rest of this mini-Howto assumes that you have fsgrab. If none of the files you are trying to recover were more than 12 blocks long (where a block is usually one kilobyte), then you won't need fsgrab. If you need to use fsgrab but don't want to, it is fairly straightforward to translate an fsgrab command-line to one for dd. If we have fsgrab -c count -s skip device then the corresponding dd command is dd bs=1k if=device count=count skip=skip I must warn you that, although fsgrab functioned perfectly for me, I can take no responsibility for how it performs. It was really a very quick and dirty kludge just to get things to work. For more details on the lack of warranty, see the `No Warranty' section in the COPYING file included with it (the GNU General Public Licence). 8. Finding the deleted inodes The next step is to ask the filesystem which inodes have recently been freed. This is a task you can accomplish with debugfs. Start debugfs with the name of the device on which the filesystem is stored: # debugfs /dev/hda5 If you want to modify the inodes directly, add a -w option to enable writing to the filesystem: # debugfs -w /dev/hda5 The debugfs command to find the deleted inodes is lsdel. So, type the command at the prompt: debugfs: lsdel After much wailing and grinding of disk mechanisms, a long list is piped into your favourite pager (the value of $PAGER). Now you'll want to save a copy of this somewhere else. If you have less, you can type -o followed by the name of an output file. Otherwise, you'll have to arrange to send the output elsewhere. Try this: debugfs: quit # echo lsdel | debugfs /dev/hda5 > lsdel.out Now, based only on the deletion time, the size, the type, and the numerical permissions and owner, you must work out which of these deleted inodes are the ones you want. With luck, you'll be able to spot them because they're the big bunch you deleted about five minutes ago. Otherwise, trawl through that list carefully. I suggest that if possible, you print out the list of the inodes you want to recover. It will make life a lot easier. 9. Obtaining the details of the inodes debugfs has a stat command which prints details about an inode. Issue the command for each inode in your recovery list. For example, if you're interested in inode number 148003, try this: debugfs: stat <148003> Inode: 148003 Type: regular Mode: 0644 Flags: 0x0 Version: 1 User: 503 Group: 100 Size: 6065 File ACL: 0 Directory ACL: 0 Links: 0 Blockcount: 12 Fragment: Address: 0 Number: 0 Size: 0 ctime: 0x31a9a574 -- Mon May 27 13:52:04 1996 atime: 0x31a21dd1 -- Tue May 21 20:47:29 1996 mtime: 0x313bf4d7 -- Tue Mar 5 08:01:27 1996 dtime: 0x31a9a574 -- Mon May 27 13:52:04 1996 BLOCKS: 594810 594811 594814 594815 594816 594817 TOTAL: 6 If you have a lot of files to recover, you'll want to automate this. Assuming that your lsdel list of inodes to recover in is in lsdel.out, try this: # cut -c1-6 lsdel.out | grep "[0-9]" | tr -d " " > inodes This new file inodes contains just the numbers of the inodes to recover, one per line. We save it because it will very likely come in handy later on. Then you just say: # sed 's/^.*$/stat <\0>/' inodes | debugfs /dev/hda5 > stats and stats contains the output of all the stat commands. 10. Recovering data blocks This part is either very easy or distinctly less so, depending on whether the file you are trying to recover is more than 12 blocks long. 10.1. Short files If the file was no more than 12 blocks long, then the block numbers of all its data are stored in the inode: you can read them directly out of the stat output for the inode. Moreover, debugfs has a command which performs this task automatically. To take the example we had before, repeated here: debugfs: stat <148003> Inode: 148003 Type: regular Mode: 0644 Flags: 0x0 Version: 1 User: 503 Group: 100 Size: 6065 File ACL: 0 Directory ACL: 0 Links: 0 Blockcount: 12 Fragment: Address: 0 Number: 0 Size: 0 ctime: 0x31a9a574 -- Mon May 27 13:52:04 1996 atime: 0x31a21dd1 -- Tue May 21 20:47:29 1996 mtime: 0x313bf4d7 -- Tue Mar 5 08:01:27 1996 dtime: 0x31a9a574 -- Mon May 27 13:52:04 1996 BLOCKS: 594810 594811 594814 594815 594816 594817 TOTAL: 6 This file has six blocks. Since this is less than the limit of 12, we get debugfs to write the file into a new location, such as /mnt/recovered.000: debugfs: dump <148003> /mnt/recovered.000 Of course, this can also be done with fsgrab; I'll present it here as an example of using it: # fsgrab -c 2 -s 594810 /dev/hda5 > /mnt/recovered.000 # fsgrab -c 4 -s 594814 /dev/hda5 >> /mnt/recovered.000 With either debugfs or fsgrab, there will be some garbage at the end of /mnt/recovered.000, but that's fairly unimportant. If you want to get rid of it, the simplest method is to take the Size field from the inode, and plug it into the bs option in a dd command line: # dd count=1 if=/mnt/recovered.000 of=/mnt/resized.000 bs=6065 Of course, it is possible that one or more of the blocks that made up your file has been overwritten. If so, then you're out of luck: that block is gone forever. (But just imagine if you'd unmounted sooner!) 10.2. Longer files The problems appear when the file has more than 12 data blocks. It pays here to know a little of how UNIX filesystems are structured. The file's data is stored in units called `blocks'. These blocks may be numbered sequentially. A file also has an `inode', which is the place where information such as owner, permissions, and type are kept. Like blocks, inodes are numbered sequentially, although they have a different sequence. A directory entry consists of the name of the file and an inode number. But with this state of affairs, it is still impossible for the kernel to find the data corresponding to a directory entry. So the inode also stores the location of the file's data blocks, as follows: ╖ The block numbers of the first 12 data blocks are stored directly in the inode; these are sometimes referred to as the direct blocks. ╖ The inode contains the block number of an indirect block. An indirect block contains the block numbers of 256 additional data blocks. ╖ The inode contains the block number of a doubly indirect block. A doubly indirect block contains the block numbers of 256 additional indirect blocks. ╖ The inode contains the block number of a triply indirect block. A triply indirect block contains the block numbers of 256 additional doubly indirect blocks. Read that again: I know it's complex, but it's also important. Now, the current kernel implementation (certainly for all versions up to and including 2.0.30) unfortunately zeroes all indirect blocks (and doubly indirect blocks, and so on) when deleting a file. So if your file was longer than 12 blocks, you have no guarantee of being able to find even the numbers of all the blocks you need, let alone their contents. The only method I have been able to find thus far is to assume that the file was not fragmented: if it was, then you're in trouble. Assuming that the file was not fragmented, there are several layouts of data blocks, according to how many data blocks the file used: 0 to 12 The block numbers are stored in the inode, as described above. 13 to 268 After the direct blocks, count one for the indirect block, and then there are 256 data blocks. 269 to 65804 As before, there are 12 direct blocks, a (useless) indirect block, and 256 blocks. These are followed by one (useless) doubly indirect block, and 256 repetitions of one (useless) indirect block and 256 data blocks. 65805 or more The layout of the first 65804 blocks is as above. Then follow one (useless) triply indirect block and 256 repetitions of a `doubly indirect sequence'. Each doubly indirect sequence consists of a (useless) doubly indirect block, followed by 256 repetitions of one (useless) indirect block and 256 data blocks. Of course, even if these assumed data block numbers are correct, there is no guarantee that the data in them is intact. In addition, the longer the file was, the less chance there is that it was written to the filesystem without appreciable fragmentation (except in special circumstances). You should note that I assume throughout that your blocksize is 1024 bytes, as this is the standard value. If your blocks are bigger, some of the numbers above will change. Specifically: since each block number is 4 bytes long, blocksize/4 is the number of block numbers that can be stored in each indirect block. So every time the number 256 appears in the discussion above, replace it with blocksize/4. The `number of blocks required' boundaries will also have to be changed. Let's look at an example of recovering a longer file. debugfs: stat <1387> Inode: 148004 Type: regular Mode: 0644 Flags: 0x0 Version: 1 User: 503 Group: 100 Size: 1851347 File ACL: 0 Directory ACL: 0 Links: 0 Blockcount: 3616 Fragment: Address: 0 Number: 0 Size: 0 ctime: 0x31a9a574 -- Mon May 27 13:52:04 1996 atime: 0x31a21dd1 -- Tue May 21 20:47:29 1996 mtime: 0x313bf4d7 -- Tue Mar 5 08:01:27 1996 dtime: 0x31a9a574 -- Mon May 27 13:52:04 1996 BLOCKS: 8314 8315 8316 8317 8318 8319 8320 8321 8322 8323 8324 8325 8326 8583 TOTAL: 14 There seems to be a reasonable chance that this file is not fragmented: certainly, the first 12 blocks listed in the inode (which are all data blocks) are contiguous. So, we can start by retrieving those blocks: # fsgrab -c 12 -s 8314 /dev/hda5 > /mnt/recovered.001 Now, the next block listed in the inode, 8326, is an indirect block, which we can ignore. But we trust that it will be followed by 256 data blocks (numbers 8327 through 8582). # fsgrab -c 256 -s 8327 /dev/hda5 >> /mnt/recovered.001 The final block listed in the inode is 8583. Note that we're still looking good in terms of the file being contiguous: the last data block we wrote out was number 8582, which is 8327 + 255. This block 8583 is a doubly indirect block, which we can ignore. It is followed by up to 256 repetitions of an indirect block (which is ignored) followed by 256 data blocks. So doing the arithmetic quickly, we issue the following commands. Notice that we skip the doubly indirect block 8583, and the indirect block 8584 immediately (we hope) following it, and start at block 8585 for data. # fsgrab -c 256 -s 8585 /dev/hda5 >> /mnt/recovered.001 # fsgrab -c 256 -s 8842 /dev/hda5 >> /mnt/recovered.001 # fsgrab -c 256 -s 9099 /dev/hda5 >> /mnt/recovered.001 # fsgrab -c 256 -s 9356 /dev/hda5 >> /mnt/recovered.001 # fsgrab -c 256 -s 9613 /dev/hda5 >> /mnt/recovered.001 # fsgrab -c 256 -s 9870 /dev/hda5 >> /mnt/recovered.001 Adding up, we see that so far we've written 12 + (7 * 256) blocks, which is 1804. The `stat' results for the inode gave us a `blockcount' of 3616; unfortunately these blocks are 512 bytes long (as a hangover from UNIX), so we really want 3616/2 = 1808 blocks of 1024 bytes. That means we need only four more blocks. The last data block written was number 10125. As we've been doing so far, we skip an indirect block (number 10126); we can then write those last four blocks. # fsgrab -c 4 -s 10127 /dev/hda5 >> /mnt/recovered.001 Now, with some luck the entire file has been recovered successfully. 11. Modifying inodes directly This method is, on the surface, much easier. However, as mentioned above, it cannot cope with files longer than 12 blocks. For each inode you want to recover, you must set the usage count to one, and set the deletion time to zero. This is done with the mi (modify inode) command in debugfs. Some sample output, modifying inode 148003 from above: debugfs: mi <148003> Mode [0100644] User ID [503] Group ID [100] Size [6065] Creation time [833201524] Modification time [832708049] Access time [826012887] Deletion time [833201524] 0 Link count [0] 1 Block count [12] File flags [0x0] Reserved1 [0] File acl [0] Directory acl [0] Fragment address [0] Fragment number [0] Fragment size [0] Direct Block #0 [594810] Direct Block #1 [594811] Direct Block #2 [594814] Direct Block #3 [594815] Direct Block #4 [594816] Direct Block #5 [594817] Direct Block #6 [0] Direct Block #7 [0] Direct Block #8 [0] Direct Block #9 [0] Direct Block #10 [0] Direct Block #11 [0] Indirect Block [0] Double Indirect Block [0] Triple Indirect Block [0] That is, I set the deletion time to 0 and the link count to 1 and just pressed return for each of the other fields. Granted, this is a little unwieldy if you have a lot of files to recover, but I think you can cope. If you'd wanted chrome, you'd have used a graphical `operating system' with a pretty `Recycle Bin'. By the way: the mi output refers to a `Creation time' field in the inode. This is a lie! (Or misleading, anyway.) The fact of the matter is that you cannot tell on a UNIX filesystem when a file was created. The st_ctime member of a struct stat refers to the `inode change time', that is, the last time when any inode details were changed. Here endeth today's lesson. Note that more recent versions of debugfs than the one I'm using probably do not include some of the fields in the listing above (specifically, Reserved1 and (some of?) the fragment fields). Once you've modified the inodes, you can quit debugfs and say: # e2fsck -f /dev/hda5 The idea is that each of the deleted files has been literally undeleted, but none of them appear in any directory entries. The e2fsck program can detect this, and will add a directory entry for each file in the /lost+found directory of the filesystem. (So if the partition is normally mounted on /usr, the files will now appear in /usr/lost+found.) All that still remains to be done is to work out the name of each file from its contents, and return it to its correct place in the filesystem tree. When you run e2fsck, you will get some informative output, and some questions about what damage to repair. Answer `yes' to everything that refers to `summary information' or to the inodes you've changed. Anything else I leave up to you, although it's usually a good idea to say `yes' to all the questions. When e2fsck finishes, you can remount the filesystem. Actually, there's an alternative to having e2fsck leave the files in /lost+found: you can use debugfs to create a link in the filesystem to the inode. Use the link command in debugfs after you've modified the inode: debugfs: link <148003> foo.txt This creates a file called foo.txt in what debugfs thinks is the current directory; foo.txt will be your file. You'll still need to run e2fsck to fix the summary information and block counts and so on. 12. Will this get easier in future? Yes. In fact, I believe it already has. Kernels in the development 2.1.x series have not zeroed indirect blocks since more than six months ago. At the beginning of December 1996, there was some talk on the linux-kernel mailing-list of producing another 2.0.x production kernel that also leaves indirect blocks intact on deletion. Although as of the pre-released versions of kernel 2.0.31 this has not happened, I suspect that it is feasible. Once Linus and the other kernel hackers overcome this limitation in the production kernels, a lot of my objections to the technique of modifying inodes by hand will disappear. At the very latest, this should happen on the release of the 2.2.x kernel series, which (according to historical kernel development time-scales) should happen some time in the first quarter of 1998. When this wart is corrected, it will also be possible to use the dump command in debugfs on long files. 13. Are there any tools to automate this process? As it happens, there are. Unfortunately, I believe that they suffer from the same problem as the manual inode modification technique: indirect blocks are unrecoverable. However, given the likelihood that this will shortly no longer be a problem, it's well worth looking these programs out now. Someone on the net mentioned lde by Scott Heavner. To be honest, I wouldn't recommend this as a tool for automating file recovery. It's more like a full-screen debugfs than anything else, although it does have some features like the ability to scan for certain types of file or for certain file contents. It also works with the xia (does anyone actually use this any more?) and minix filesystems, which I guess is its major selling point these days. Version 2.3.4 is available on Sunsite <ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/Filesystems/lde-2.3.4.tar.gz> and mirrors (although it's possible there's a more recent version than this; I found that one on an 8-month-old CD-ROM archive). lde does have some fairly useful documentation on basic filesystem concepts, as well as a document on how to use it for recovering deleted files. Although I haven't used it, I suspect that my method above is better. It sounds like the program that really works is the GNU Midnight Commander, mc. This is a full-screen file management tool, based AFAIK on a certain MS-DOS program commonly known as `NC'. mc supports the mouse on the Linux console and in an xterm, and provides virtual filesystems which allow tricks like cd-ing to a tarfile. Among its virtual filesystems is one for ext2 undeletion. It all sounds very handy, although I must admit I've never used the program myself -- I prefer good old-fashioned shell commands. Apparently one must configure the program with the --with-ext2undel option; you'll also need the development libraries and include files that come with the e2fsprogs package. I gather that once the program is built, you can tell it to cd undel:dev/hda5/, and get a `directory listing' of deleted files. The latest non-development version is probably 4.0; as with the kernel itself, development versions are not recommended to non-hackers. The list of (over 70) download sites is available on the Midnight Commander 4 website <http://mc.blackdown.org/mc4/>, or try the official ftp site <ftp://ftp.nuclecu.unam.mx/linux/local/mc-4.0.tar.gz> (which if memory serves is rather slow). 14. Colophon I intend to produce regular updates to this document as long as I have both enough time to do it, and something interesting to say. This means that I am eager to hear comments from readers. Could my writing be clearer?. Can you think of something that would make matters easier? Is there some new tool that does it all automatically? Who did kill JFK? Whatever. If you have something to say, about this document or any other subject, drop me a line on <aaronc@pobox.com>. 15. Credits and Bibliography `If I have seen farther than others, it is because I was standing on the shoulders of giants.' (Isaac Newton) Much of this mini-Howto was derived from a posting in the comp.os.linux.misc newsgroup by Robin Glover <swrglovr@met.rdg.ac.uk>. I would like to thank Robin for graciously allowing me to rework his ideas into this mini-Howto. Some bibliographic references: ╖ Frisch, ╞leen (1995), Essential System Administration, second edition, O'Reilly and Associates, Inc., ISBN: 1-56592-127-5. ╖ Glover, Robin (31 Jan 1996), HOW-TO : undelete linux files (ext2fs/debugfs), comp.os.linux.misc Usenet posting. ╖ Peek, Jerry, Tim O'Reilly, Mike Loukides et al (1993), UNIX Power Tools, O'Reilly and Associates, Inc./Random House, Inc., ISBN: 0-679-79073-X. 16. Legalities All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Specifically: ╖ MS-DOS and Windows are trademarks of Microsoft <http://www.microsoft.com/>. ╖ UNIX is a trademark of the Open Group <http://www.open.org/>. ╖ The trademark status of the name Linux is currently being contested by lawyers. A certain Walter R. Della Croce has made an allegedly false trademark registration for the term. Further information on the Linux trademark issue is available from the Linux Mall <http://www.linuxmall.com/announce/>. This document is Copyright ⌐ 1997 Aaron Crane <aaronc@pobox.com>. It may be freely redistributed in its entirety, including the whole of this copyright notice, but may not be changed without permission from either the author or the Linux Documentation Project Coordinator. Dispensation is granted for copying small verbatim portions for the purposes of reviews or for quoting; in these circumstances, sections may be reproduced in the presence of an appropriate citation but without this copyright notice. The author requests but does not require that parties intending to sell copies of this document, whether on computer-readable or human- readable media, inform either him or the Linux HOWTO Coordinator of their intentions. The Linux HOWTO Coordinator is Greg Hankins <gregh@sunsite.unc.edu>.